Music sounds better without “vous”

A glance upon the charts of any non-English speaking nation will reveal a plethora of songs in the English language. Spain and France currently have 13 songs in English in their top 20s, Germany has 17. The UK chart currently has no songs not in it’s native language.
This seems like a big discrepancy. It can’t be that the majority of the best musicians in the world are English speaking. The UK haven’t won the Eurovision song contest since 1997. While this is often claimed to be a political contest rather than a musical one, and whilst the winners have often sung in English, it is a sign that musicians from non-English speaking countries are as good as those who speak English.
So why do we have so few foreign language songs in our charts? Psy’s Gangnam Style was the only non-English song in the top 100 singles of 2012 and it is one of those freak occurrences which occur every so often when the song is just so catchy that we can’t ignore it over here on our fair isle. Other examples are Macarena and La Bamba but these are so infrequent as to be largely irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.
The biggest foreign artists often sing in English to get biggest exposure. Bjork, Daft Punk and Kraftwerk (at times) have all taken to our language to get us to accept them as musicians. Why are we so averse to songs sung in a language we don’t understand?
English is spoken throughout the world. The cultural influence of both English music and films is so pervasive that it can be difficult to go anywhere in the world and not be able to survive speaking only English.
Whether it is a sense of self-importance, the difficulty of learning other languages or just a reluctance to learn one when it isn’t necessary, the English-speaking world is largely mono-lingual.
The art that we accept into our culture is therefore an extension of this. We will send our blockbuster movies abroad but will rarely see many world cinema films in our cinemas. We will send our music overseas but except for the odd dance hit, rarely embrace any songs when we can’t understand what the musician is singing about.
Rammstein are a notable exception. They are successful outside Germany partly because the German language actually suits their style of music better than English. The metal band benefit from the harsh sounds of German complimenting their heavy bassy guitar sounds and they have probably been more successful than had they sung in English. Try translating and singing ‘Du Hast Mich’ to get an idea of why this might be.  
A similar argument could be put for why Sigur Ros have gained popularity in this country as their post-rock melodies are very much suited to singing in their mix of Icelandic and Hopelandic. These can be seen more as exceptions that prove the rule rather than a sign of change.
It does seem to be a modern phenomena. Opera is sung largely in Italian,  Russian, French, German as well as English. Foreign language operas are still extremely popular today and form the bulk of the operatic cannon. This is perhaps a historic legacy which would not occur if opera first gained popularity in modern society. There may also be elements of class difference as the audience for opera is generally middle/upper class whereas pop music is predominantly aimed at the lower/middle classes.
The size of the music industries in the UK and USA must be part of the contributing reason for this. There is a larger budget pumped into them which in turn could produce higher quality musicians.

The artist’s desire for success and attempting to reach the largest audience will be another factor. To gain the largest exposure, it makes sense to sing in the language that the largest number of people can understand. This is and probably will be for a long time English and hence the biggest commercial musicians are likely to sing in English. 

Guy Fawkes versus Russell Brand

I love traditions. I love the fact that everyone is doing the same thing and having fun together. Quite a lot of the time, the meaning is lost or forgotten or – mainly for children – unknown.

Kids just know that sometime in February they get pancakes, in March/April they get chocolate eggs, in October they dress up scary, in November there are fireworks and in December they get presents. I don’t actually think that’s a bad thing. I’m quite happy for traditions to continue as long as they are fun and don’t hurt people.

The other day, though, as I was going “ooh” and “aah” I was thinking about Guy Fawkes and Russell Brand. I imagine everyone watching fireworks that night must have made the same connection but for anyone who missed it, this was my line of thought.

Guy Fawkes was a dissident. He was part of a group with a specific goal, definite plans and very well co-ordinated. He wanted to overthrow the ruling power (King James) and replace them with another (Princess Elizabeth).

Russell Brand is a dissident. He is part of no group, has no specific goal, no definite plans and is not co-ordinated in any way.

I feel that in telling people not to vote, Brand is actually a danger to society. The people that Brand is telling not to vote are more likely to be the middle ground voters – and by that I mean the non-extremists. The extremes are the ones who are almost guaranteed to turn out and vote regardless of anything else. The Ukips and the BNPs, the Greens and the Socialists.

By encouraging people to not vote, the number of votes required for one of these parties to get in is therefore reduced and we have seen numbers of these gain seats over the recent years.

Brand’s solution may actually condemn us Nazi-ism and we don’t have an Indiana Jones around to save us this time. Thanks, Russell.

What he should be doing, is encouraging people to vote for the least bad option whilst he figures out his grand plans for an alternative system. However, I doubt that any system will be forthcoming, at least in my life time. Other systems have been tried in the past 100 years – communism, dictatorships – but have been fought down by the good old Western democracies.

Brand’s solution is to make the ruling power work for the people better and provide a more egalitarian system. Democracy is currently the best solution for this. The only logical way to take this further that I have been able to think of since watching his interview with Paxman is to have all decisions made by all of the people.

Give everyone little yes/no/abstain buzzers in their homes, linked up to the TV set and pop up exciting questions such as Should abortion be legal?, Should we invade Syria? and Should we stop all of the foreigns coming in? and I’m sure you’ll get lots of interaction and popular consensus. Good luck getting decisions made about sewers or tax though.

Me, I prefer to leave the power in the hands of the people who spend their whole working lives thinking about these problems and working towards solutions together. Sure, some of them might be complete idiots, whack jobs or repulsive people. That’s why there’s 600-odd of them, to try and have a consensus between the people we elect to represent us.

Whilst I have a lot of faith in my fellow citizens, I’m sure not all of them are educated enough on Israel/Palestine, the NHS and the school system among other things to be able to make important informed choices. Leave it up to the people who train to do this, even if they are complete douches.

We need to learn from our history. Our government is the result of years of trial and error at different systems and this is the one that the majority believe works best. When you think about it, compared to other situations in the world right now (Zimbabwe, North Korea) and those in the past (Nazis, McCarthyism) the current system isn’t too bad really.


Notes:

1. I would vote Green if they fielded a candidate in my area. I am aware that the word extreme might seem odd in this context but they are one of the more left-field parties.

2. Robert Webb wrote a much better response to Brand which is here but I have been needing to get this out for a while.

3. I was going to do an amazing Photoshop of Brand wearing a Guy Fawkes mask but a) I left it too late and have to go to work, b) I don’t have Photoshop, c) I’m not good at Photoshop and d) the internet has a picture of him wearing one from the Million Mask March.